Physicochemical Characteristic of Fermented Goat Milk Added with Different Starters Lactic Acid Bacteria
Keywords:Starters LAB, dadih
Development of traditional food including dadih to be commercial fermented milk was needed to achieve efficiency and effective of products. Dadih with natural starter needs to be changed with starters because starters can be produced commercially. This study aims to evaluate physicochemical characteristic of fermented goat milk that added with different starters Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) isolated from dadih. The materials used for this research were starters LAB that isolated from dadih. In this experiment, treatments were used different starters that namely starter 11, starter 21, starter 25, starter 29, and starter 41 then analized about water content, ash content, fat content, syneresis, and viscosity. The experiment was carried out with three replications. The data were analyzed by ANOVA using the basic design of Completely Randomized Design (CRD) and continued by Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT) if there was a significantly different. The results showed that different starters had influence on water content, ash content, fat content, syneresis, and viscosity. It could be concluded that starters 11 and 41 were the best starter that can be applied in fermented goat milk product based on physical quality with lower syneresis and higher viscosity. But based on chemical quality, starter 11 was the best starter with lower water content and higher ash content.
Akabanda, F., Owusu-Kwarteng, J., Tano-Debrah, K., Parkouda, C., & Jespersen, L. (2014). The use of lactic acid bacteria starter culture in the production of nunu , a spontaneously fermented milk product in ghana. International Journal of Food Science,2014,1â€“11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/721067
Alyaqoubi, S., Abdullah, A., Samudi, M., Abdullah, N., Addai, Z. R., & Al-ghazali, M. (2015). Advance journal of food science & technology : AJFST. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology, 7(4), 235â€“241.
AOAC. (2000). Official Methods of Analysis. 17th Edition, Gaithersburg, MD, USA: The Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
Bahobail, A. S., Ali, A. A., & Alyan, A. A. (2014). Effect of fermentation process on the improvement of nutrition value of camel milk. International Journal of Multidisciplinary & Current Research, 2, 78â€“82. Retrieved from http://ijmcr.com
Bibiana, I., Joseph, S., & Julius, A. (2014). Physicochemical, microbiological & sensory evaluation of yoghurt sold in Makurdi metropolis. African Journal of Food Science & Technology, 5(6), 129â€“135. Retrieved from http://www.interesjournals.org/ajfst/june-2014-vol-5-issue-6/physicochemical-microbiological-and-sensory-evaluation-of-yoghurt-sold-in-makurdi-metropolis
Chye, S. J., Ahmad, R., & Noorr Azizah, A. A. (2012). Studies on the physicochemical & sensory characteristics of goatâ€™s milk dadih incorporated with tropical- fruit purees. International Food Research Journal, 19(4), 1387â€“1392. Retrieved from http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my
Dinkov, K., Duskova, M., & Toskhov, N. (2008). Regression models for density & viscosity of ultrafiltration milk concentrates BulgarianJournal of Agricultural Science, 14(6), 542â€“548.
Ehirim, F. N., & Onyeneke, E. N. (2013). Physico â€“ Chemical & organoleptic properties of yoghurt manufactured with cow milk & goat milk. Natural & Applied Sciences, 4(4), 245â€“252.
Elida, M. (2002). profil bakteri asam laktat dari dadih yang difermentasi dalam berbagai jenis bambu & potensinya sebagai probiotik. Master Thesis. Bogor: Program Studi Ilmu Pangan, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Hadisaputro, W., Taufiq, T. T., & Anindita, N. S. (2013). Fermented goat milk & cow milk produced by different starters of lactic acid bacteria: Quality Studies. Journal of Agricultural Science & Technology, 3, 904â€“911.
Joon, R., Mishra, S. K., Brar, G. S., Singh, P. K., & Panwar H. (2017). Instrumental texture & syneresis analysis of yoghurt prepared from goat & cow milk. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 6(7), 971â€“974. Retrieved from http://www.thepharmajournal.com/archives/2017/vol6issue7/PartG/6-7-73-280.pdf
Kalyankar, S. D., Khedkar, C. D., & Patil, A. M. (2016). Goat: Milk. In Encyclopedia of Food & Health (pp. 256â€“260). London: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384947-2.00358-5
Ladokun, O., & Oni, S. (2014). Fermented milk products from different milk types. Food & Nutrition Sciences, 5(13), 1228â€“1233. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2014.513133
Lawal, A. K., & Adedeji, O. M. (2013). Nutritional and elemental analysis of warankasi (fermented milk product) sold in Lagos metropolis. International Research Journal of Biotechnology, 4(6), 112â€“116. Retrieved from http://www.interesjournals.org/journal/june-2013-vol-4-issue-6/nutritional-and-elemental-analysis-of-warankasi-fermented-milk-product-sold-in-lagos-metropolis
Lee, W. J., & Lucey, J. A. (2010). Formation & physical properties of yogurt. J. Anim. Sci, 23(9), 1127â€“1136.
Moyane, J. N., & Jideani, A. I. O. (2013). The physicochemical & sensory evaluation of commercial sour milk (amasi) products. African Journal of Food Science, 7(4), 56â€“62. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJFS12.089
Nouri, M., Ezzatpanah, H., & Abbasi, S. (2011). Application of renneted skim milk as a fat mimetics in nonfat yoghurt. Food & Nutrition Sciences, 2(6), 541â€“548. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2011.26077
Nuraida, L. (2015). A review: Health promoting lactic acid bacteria in traditional Indonesian fermented foods. Food Science and Human Wellness, 4(2), 47â€“55. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FSHW.2015.06.001
Owiah, S. G., Naomi, D., Vida, G., & Martha, A. (2016). Preparation of semi-dairy yoghurt from soy bean. American Journal of Food Science & Technology, Vol. 5, 2016, Pages 1-5, 5(1), 1â€“5. https://doi.org/10.12691/AJFST-5-1-1
Surono, I. S. (2003). In vitro probiotic properties of indigenous dadih lactic acid bacteria. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 16(5), 726â€“731. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.726
Syukur, S., Hermansyah, A., & Fachrial, E. (2016). Probiotics & strong antimicrobial of buffalo milk fermentation (dadih) from different places in west sumatera indonesia. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological & Chemical Sciences, 7(6), 386â€“392.
Vareltzis, P., Adamopoulos, K., Stavrakakis, E., Stefanakis, A., & Goula, A. M. (2016). Approaches to minimise yoghurt syneresis in simulated tzatziki sauce preparation. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 69(2), 191â€“199.
Wang, D. H. and H. C. Tsai. 2015. Bamboo resources & carbon storage in Taiwan. 10th World Bamboo Congress, Korea.
Widyastuti, Y., Rohmatussolihat, & Febrisiantosa, A. (2014). The role of lactic acid bacteria in milk fermentation. Food & Nutrition Sciences, 5(4), 435â€“442. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2014.54051
Yelnetty, A., Purnomo, H., . P., & Mirah, A. (2011). Biochemical characteristics of lactic acid bacteria with proteolytic activity & capability as starter culture isolated from spontaneous fermented local goat milk Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 4(10), 137â€“146.
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).